The black death of environment: is design the problem?

When physicians seeking to uncover the cause observed that women who gave birth at home had a significantly lower chance of developing the fever, they realised that the very cure is the problem.

In 1843, a year after the tragic deaths in the Vienna hospital, American physician Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. published his essay, “The Contagiousness of Puerperal Fever,” identifying poor hygiene practices among doctors and nurses as the source of the outbreak.

Today’s concern is similar, but it is related to the contribution of urban and landscape designers to sustainability and climate challenges.

Are the designers aware that moving from one design project to another without sharpening their pencils, understanding context, and updating their algorithms contributes to an aggravation of future environmental, economic, and social issues? Here are three potential reasons:

Environmental impact

A recent study by Ryan McNeilly Smith et al. showed that planning professionals had a lower awareness of urban design and planning played in heat mitigation and adaptation strategies than urban designers and architects.

Urban and landscape design plays a crucial role in shaping our environment, and poor design choices can have serious consequences. Historically, urban planning has often prioritised short-term functionality or aesthetics without considering long-term environmental, and economic impacts.

Linear park regenerates Mexico City’s historic Grand Canal. © Onnis Luquehttps://www.archdaily.com/964460/6-urban-design-projects-with-nature-based-solutions

Economic impact

It was proved recently that  low-carbon garden landscape design can provide a good environment for people’s low-carbon life and further ideas for landscape designers. Urban and landscape design greatly influence economic outcomes, both positively and negatively. Poorly planned developments can result in economic inefficiencies, such as increased infrastructure maintenance costs and expenses related to mitigating environmental damage. Suburban sprawl, for instance, often leads to high costs for transportation, infrastructure, and energy consumption, potentially leaving behind decaying neighborhoods if economic growth falters.

Conversely, thoughtful design can stimulate economic growth by creating vibrant, mixed-use communities that attract businesses and residents. The key challenge is prioritising long-term financial sustainability and ensuring that benefits are distributed equitably.

Investing in sustainable urban and landscape design can enhance property values, reduce public health costs, and attract tourism and business investment. Green infrastructure, such as parks and tree-lined streets, has been linked to increased retail activity and higher real estate prices. Meanwhile, energy-efficient buildings and transit-oriented developments can lower operational costs and boost economic resilience. By integrating sustainability into urban planning, cities can foster long-term economic stability while improving the quality of life for residents.

Social impact

The social consequences of urban and landscape design are highly visible yet often overlooked, as design decisions can either exacerbate or alleviate social inequalities. For instance, waterfront regeneration is impacted by certain social aspects. Conversely, well-designed public spaces, such as parks and pedestrian-friendly streets, can enhance well-being and promote social cohesion within communities.

However, designs that favor affluent residents or tourists can lead to gentrification, displacing long-standing residents and undermining the neighborhood’s social fabric. The challenge lies in creating inclusive designs that serve the needs of all community members.

Moreover, accessible and community-driven urban design fosters a sense of belonging and strengthens social networks. Inclusive public spaces that accommodate diverse cultural and recreational needs encourage interaction among different social groups, reducing isolation and promoting equity. Additionally, integrating safety measures, such as adequate lighting and well-maintained walkways, ensures that public spaces remain welcoming and usable for all, particularly vulnerable populations such as children, the elderly, and individuals with disabilities.

The “Third Diamond” needed

In urban and landscape design, the concept of a “third diamond” emphasises the importance of considering the long-term impacts of design decisions on the environment, economy, and society. Designers should integrate foresight and ethical considerations throughout the design process.

This includes environmental foresight, focusing on:

  • climate resilience and sustainability through strategies like green infrastructure;
  • economic foresight, which ensures long-term viability and minimizes future financial burdens;
  • and social foresight, promoting inclusivity and equity by engaging diverse stakeholders and considering the needs of all communities.

Conclusion

Urban and landscape designers referenced in the article have a responsibility to see beyond the immediate goals of their work, similarly to the doctors. They must anticipate and mitigate negative consequences, ensuring their designs contribute positively to the world.

Short-term thinking and a narrow focus on creation have led to long-term harm which risks repeating the mistakes of the past.

By embracing a more conscientious and forward-thinking approach, designers can help build cities and landscapes that are not only beautiful and functional but also sustainable, equitable, and resilient for generations to come.

Feature image: thanks to az.design

Leave a comment