carbon offsetting vs biodiversity

Carbon crediting and land offsets for biodiversity protection are developed to deal with the increasing emissions of greenhouse gases and the loss of global biodiversity.

The problem with using them separately.

When people focus only on capturing carbon (which is the main goal of carbon-focused crediting and offsetting), it can lead to the creation of non-native, fast-growing monocultures. These monocultures are harmful to biodiversity and the services that soil provides to ecosystems.

Soil is crucial for biodiversity

Soil is essential for biodiversity as it contains various living organisms and plays a significant role in maintaining biodiversity globally.

A new co-crediting scheme

The proposal suggests a different approach – a combined system that takes into account both carbon and biodiversity. It involves analyzing soil samples and using remote sensing to estimate carbon stored in plants. Additionally, monitoring of aboveground organisms through video and acoustic analyses is used. This new approach can encourage industries and governments to be more careful and fair in considering biodiversity when undertaking carbon sequestration projects. By prioritizing protection over restoration, it can lead to more sustainable land management for a future that supports nature.

In a nutshell, the proposed co-crediting scheme seeks to address both carbon capture and biodiversity protection, ensuring that the efforts to combat climate change also contribute positively to the health of ecosystems and the natural world.

Source: https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ppp3.10405

Leave a comment